Akram Ben Ahmed/IEEE draft の履歴(No.1)

• 履歴一覧
• ソース を表示
• Akram Ben Ahmed/IEEE draft は削除されています。
  • 1 (2014-04-12 (土) 08:58:23)
  • 2 (2014-04-22 (火) 01:35:19)

Akram Ben Ahmed/coming-journal-paper-schedule

First draft: Completed on August 16, 2013 (PDF, Latex)†

Discussion of the meeting held on Friday, August 16th 2013:

• Complete the simulation of the system previously discussed:
  • RAB for buffer fault-tolerance
  • BLoD for crossbar fault-tolerance

• Implement the optimization for the RAB.
  • Start first by implementing the borrowing technique
  • Second, implement the prediction table for the buffer sharing technique
  • Investigate about the best rule that should be set for the prediction of the least busy buffer

• Implement the optimization for the Bypass-Link-on-Demand (BLoD):
  • Exploit the unsed crossbar links on the edges of the network instead of adding additional bypass links
  • Investigate about a mathematical model expressing the unused crossbar link (as a motivation)

• Evaluation: Divide the evaluation into three section:
  • Evaluate the RAB technique in terms hardware complexity, throughput, and latency
  • Compare three different systems:
    • RAB with no buffer sharing
    • RAB with the borrowing technique
    • RAB with the prediction table

• Evaluate BLoD technique in terms hardware complexity, throughput, and latency
• Compare different systems:
  • No BLoD
  • One Bypass-link
  • Optimal number of Bypass-link

• Evaluate LAFT routing in terms hardware complexity, throughput, and latency
• Compare with:
  • XYZ
  • LA-XYZ

Second draft : Completed on October 15, 2013 (PDF, Latex)†

Third draft : Completed on December 17, 2013 (PDF, Latex)†

Fourth draft : Completed on March 25, 2014 (PDF, Latex)†

Major modifications:†

• Rewrite the Introduction part
• Add anew section (Failure Anlaysis)

• Rewrite the Related work
  • remove the irrelevant works
  • Dedicate a subsection for routing algorithm
  • Dedicate a subsection for reliable router architecture

• Modify the hardware evaluation section:
  • Use Design compiler for the evaluation instead of Quartus II
  • Include a small table comparing the area and power overhead of the proposed router with that of the baseline one
  • Add a mall paragraph about the layout of the router obtained with SoC Encounter

Last update: March 26th, 2014. 3.40 p.m.